SUPER INADEQUACY FINALLY ACKNOWLEDGED
Politicians have finally acknowledged what most of us have known for some time – it will not be possible for superannuation to provide us with an adequate income for 20-25 years of dignified retirement for the vast majority of us.
Which is why I have been urging my private clients to build a portfolio of investment properties.
When the Australian Government announced the review of Australia's tax system in May 2008, the review was to look solely at the current tax system and make recommendations to position Australia to deal with the demographic, social, economic and environmental challenges of the 21st century.
This study – the Henry Review – was to consider (among other topics) the tax benefits afforded to superannuation, but now the terms of reference have been amended to provide for consideration of the adequacy of existing superannuation arrangements.
Of course the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia have long advocated that the employer contributions should be 15%, and the major wealth management company AMP now believes that a target for “adequacy” is 65% of an individual’s pre-retirement living standards.
COTA Over 50s – reflecting the less affluent socio-economics of its membership base - has long advocated a retirement incomes system based on the actual cost of living in modest circumstances commensurate with contemporary Australian standards. A pension of 35% of male total average weekly earnings seems a good place to start, they say.
However none of these institutions have the solution to outliving our wealth, and inflation-protecting our income in retirement.
Which is why investment properties are so attractive.
If you would like me to help you explore your options, feel free to contact me – Bernard Kelly – anytime on admin@retirelaughing.comLabels: baby boomers, Bernard Kelly, income in retirement, retirement, retirement income |
